Legal Action Facts
Who We Are
Navient supports the investment students make in college by helping them navigate a complex federal student loan program created by Congress. Despite a maze of obstacles for borrowers, we have led the way by increasing enrollment in affordable payment plans and helping millions of Americans successfully pay off their student loans.
OUR ROLE AS A FEDERAL STUDENT LOAN SERVICER
Federal student loan servicers such as Navient do not set loan terms like interest rates, loan limits, and repayment programs—these are established by the federal government. Servicers begin working with student borrowers after many important decisions about how much to borrow or where to attend college are already made.
WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT LAWSUITS INVOLVING NAVIENT
Beginning in January 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and five state attorneys general filed lawsuits against Navient asserting a variety of allegations. Their primary allegation is that Navient “steered” borrowers away from income-driven repayment plans and toward forbearance. These and other allegations are false and demonstrably so. The lawsuits are still pending, and there have been no court rulings on the facts of the cases.
THE ALLEGATIONS ARE UNFOUNDED AND HERE’S WHY …
On May 19, 2020, Navient filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the CFPB lawsuit, seeking to dismiss the case in its entirety.
Here are the facts:
- Navient is a national leader in enrolling eligible borrowers into income-driven repayment (IDR) plans, and more than half of the Department of Education loans we service are enrolled in IDR programs—more than any comparable servicer. Furthermore, servicers are paid up to 60% less so there is no economic interest to place a borrower in forbearance over an IDR plan.
- The CFPB’s assertion that Navient steered borrowers away from IDR plans and toward forbearance is plainly false. Indeed, after nearly seven years of investigations and false claims, the CFPB has not been able to identify even one borrower who was “steered” away from an income-driven repayment plan into forbearance, and that is because we do not do this.
- For the vast majority of loans, interest accrues regardless of whether the borrower was in an IDR or other repayment plan or in forbearance. Navient forbearance usage is in line with or lower than other major servicers.
- Navient has provided clear and easily understood notices to borrowers about IDR plans and their renewals.
- The CFPB could not provide any evidence to support its assertion that Navient’s practice of notifying borrowers about IDR renewal was unfair and deceptive, or caused any borrowers to miss their renewal deadline.
- Navient accurately processes tens of millions of borrower payments every year.
- The CFPB has failed to provide evidence that Navient mishandles borrower payments. Navient has a strong track record of ensuring that borrower payments are applied and allocated correctly.
Student loan servicers succeed when borrowers succeed.
Navient will continue to vigorously defend itself against these baseless claims with the facts and our strong performance and support of our customers’ success.
Fact sheet on Legal Actions:Show all
CFPB Case Resources:Show all
State AG Case Resources:Show all
SUPPORTING A STRONG, CENTRAL SET OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS TO HELP BORROWERS
In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson signed the Higher Education Act into law. Since then, it has helped millions of Americans earn college degrees. Too many Americans, however, have had to borrow too much to do so, and outstanding student loan debt is now about $1.7 trillion. To address the issue, some states are adding state-specific regulations to federal student loans. While well-intended, this is misguided: such regulation would not only allocate scarce resources on the wrong solution, it would create more challenges for borrowers.
Supporting preemption does not mean states must stay on the sidelines. They can promote college readiness, support efforts that improve college completion, make financial literacy a key component in the educational process, require colleges to provide transparent data on debt and costs, and establish state student-loan ombudsperson offices. Further, if borrowers believe they are victims of fraud, misrepresentation, or some other consumer protection harm that does not conflict with federal law, they may file suit in state court or turn to their state attorney general for recourse.
Servicers, states, and the U.S. Department of Education must work together to develop a strong, central set of federal regulations that work for borrowers.